Is there a public exploit for CVE-2024-1394?

No public exploit for CVE-2024-1394 was found in Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei templates or public proof-of-concept repositories. That is an absence of evidence rather than proof that none exists.

How severe is CVE-2024-1394?

CVE-2024-1394 scores CVSS 7.5 (v3.1), rated high. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 1.53%.

What does CVE-2024-1394 affect?

CVE-2024-1394 affects Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14, Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support.

7.5 High

A memory leak flaw was found in Golang in the RSA encrypting/decrypting code, which might lead to a resource exhaustion vulnerability using…

CVE-2024-1394

A memory leak flaw was found in Golang in the RSA encrypting/decrypting code, which might lead to a resource exhaustion vulnerability using attacker-controlled inputs. The memory leak happens in github.com/golang-fips/openssl/openssl/rsa.go#L113. The objects leaked are pkey and ctx. That function uses named return parameters to free pkey and ctx if there is an error initializing the context or setting the different properties. All return statements related to error cases follow the "return nil, nil, fail(...)" pattern, meaning that pkey and ctx will be nil inside the deferred function that should free them.

Assessment

CVSS: 7.5 (v3.1)
Severity: High
EPSS: 1.53% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days
Known exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
Exploit availability: Nothing found in Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or public PoC repositories
Published: 21 March 2024
Last updated: 4 November 2026
Affected: Red Hat · RHODF-4.16-RHEL-9 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8 · Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 9 · Red Hat Developer Tools
Assigner: redhat

CVSS vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

At the source

EUVD (ENISA)

References

Community proofs of concept

No community proof of concept yet. If you have one for a published vulnerability and the right to share it, add it below — it will appear here once reviewed.

Submit a proof of concept

Only for publicly disclosed vulnerabilities, and only material from testing you were authorised to perform. This platform does not buy, sell, or broker exploits — see earning from vulnerability research for legitimate bounty programs. Submissions are reviewed before they appear. Text only; do not include live credentials, personal data, or anything targeting systems you are not permitted to test.

Title *

Proof of concept *

Write-up (optional)

Affected versions (optional)

Name or handle (optional)

References (optional, one URL per line)

Licence for your contribution *

Private contact (optional, never shown)

Before you submit * This vulnerability is already publicly disclosed (it has a published CVE). This material comes only from testing I was authorised to perform. I have the legal right to publish this content and am not breaching any agreement by doing so. It contains no live credentials, personal data, or anything targeting systems I am not authorised to test. I understand it will be reviewed before it appears publicly and may be rejected. I agree to the submission terms.

What is 5 + 3? *

Query this programmatically

Agents can read this through the MCP endpoint, or over HTTP:

curl https://cve.zerocrew.in/api/cve/CVE-2024-1394