Is there a public exploit for CVE-2026-68971?

No public exploit for CVE-2026-68971 was found in Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei templates or public proof-of-concept repositories. That is an absence of evidence rather than proof that none exists.

How severe is CVE-2026-68971?

CVE-2026-68971 scores CVSS 6.5 (v3.1), rated medium. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.33%.

What does CVE-2026-68971 affect?

CVE-2026-68971 affects Apache Software Foundation Apache Airflow.

6.5 Medium

Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (POST /api/v2/assets/{assetid}/materialize) and the XCom result check on…

CVE-2026-68971

Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (POST /api/v2/assets/{assetid}/materialize) and the XCom result check on waitdagrununtilfinished authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other authorization site. A team-aware auth manager distinguishes a team-scoped Dag from a global one by that field -- the Keycloak auth manager, for example, checks the DAG resource instead of DAG: -- so the team-scoped permission that should gate the request was never consulted. In a deployment running multi-team mode with a team-aware auth manager, an authenticated user in one team could trigger Dag runs belonging to another team, supplying their own dagrunid and conf, and could read another team's XCom values. Deployments using the FAB auth manager are unaffected, as it has no multi-team support. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which resolves the Dag's team at both sites.

Assessment

CVSS: 6.5 (v3.1)
Severity: Medium
EPSS: 0.33% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days
Known exploited: Not listed in CISA KEV
Exploit availability: Nothing found in Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or public PoC repositories
Published: 12 August 2026
Last updated: 3 November 2026
Affected: Apache Software Foundation · Apache Airflow
Assigner: apache

CVSS vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

At the source

EUVD (ENISA)

References

Community proofs of concept

No community proof of concept yet. If you have one for a published vulnerability and the right to share it, add it below — it will appear here once reviewed.

Submit a proof of concept

Only for publicly disclosed vulnerabilities, and only material from testing you were authorised to perform. This platform does not buy, sell, or broker exploits — see earning from vulnerability research for legitimate bounty programs. Submissions are reviewed before they appear. Text only; do not include live credentials, personal data, or anything targeting systems you are not permitted to test.

Title *

Proof of concept *

Write-up (optional)

Affected versions (optional)

Name or handle (optional)

References (optional, one URL per line)

Licence for your contribution *

Private contact (optional, never shown)

Before you submit * This vulnerability is already publicly disclosed (it has a published CVE). This material comes only from testing I was authorised to perform. I have the legal right to publish this content and am not breaching any agreement by doing so. It contains no live credentials, personal data, or anything targeting systems I am not authorised to test. I understand it will be reviewed before it appears publicly and may be rejected. I agree to the submission terms.

What is 2 + 1? *

Query this programmatically

Agents can read this through the MCP endpoint, or over HTTP:

curl https://cve.zerocrew.in/api/cve/CVE-2026-68971